“It is good to have an end to journey towards,
but it is the journey that matters in the end.”
- Ursula K. le Guinn

Process Evaluation

The Basics of Process Evaluation

Description

Process evaluation is the mechanism for assessing the delivery of your program. It’s a kind of quality control that documents what makes up the program each time it is delivered, and whether the program is being delivered as planned. While outcome evaluation is designed to find out what the program accomplished, process evaluation is designed to find out what the program actually was when it was delivered. It is then possible to determine whether the actual program differed from the planned program, and whether or not the deviations from what was planned benefited or detracted from the program.

Purpose

Process evaluation can serve many purposes. Some of the most important are to:

  • Assess the degree to which the program is being conducted as planned
  • Compare program delivery across staff or sites
  • Link specific methods of program delivery to program outcomes
  • Provide information for improving program elements
  • Provide feedback for program managers regarding the quality of implementation
  • Provide information on program accountability to stakeholders such as funders, volunteers, or participants

When To Conduct

Process evaluation should begin as soon as the program is put into action and continue throughout the life of the program. Therefore, you need to design the forms and methods for process evaluation while the program is under development.

Target Population

In process evaluation we study elements of the program, rather than people or workplaces. We compare what the program actually did with what the program planned to do. In order to do this we might count the number of volunteers trained, the number of legislators given information, or the number of workplaces visited, because each of these is a program activity. But the target population for process evaluation is the number of people with whom the program actually interacted, not the number of people with whom the program planned to interact.

Top

Types of Information Produced by Process Evaluation

Process evaluation is useful for fully understanding how a program works, how it produces the results that it does.

Some typical questions that process evaluation might answer include:

  • Was each program activity completed as planned?
  • To how many people/workplaces/communities was each activity delivered?
  • How many program materials were distributed?
  • What were participants’, workplaces’ or communities’ perceptions of each activity? Of the program?
  • What were staff members’ perceptions of each activity? Of the program?
  • What were the strengths of the way the program was implemented?
  • What were the difficulties, barriers, or challenges to implementation?
  • What strengths and weaknesses were present for of each step of the program’s tobacco use prevention intervention?
  • Did the people or organizations that participated in the intervention understand it?
  • Were all the resources needed for project activities available?
  • What was the nature of the interaction between staff and participants?

As this list suggests, there are numerous questions that might be addressed in a process evaluation. The evaluation questions for your process evaluation can be selected by carefully considering what is important to know about your program.

Top

Process Evaluation Methods and Tools

The method you select for process evaluation depends on what you want to know and how you plan to keep track of those data while the program is in operation. These three important questions can help guide you in this exercise.1

  1. What is the program intended to do, and for whom?
    Information to answer this question should be available from documents such as program proposals, correspondence, requests for funding, and recruitment materials. Additional information can be obtained through interviews with those who developed the program, and those who were recruited to participate. For more about conducting interviews, go to Individual Interviews in the Data Collection section of The Power of Proof series.
     
  2. What does the program actually deliver, and to whom?
    This question can be more difficult to answer than the first one. The primary way of determining what your program is delivering is to keep track of all contacts with the people, households, workplaces, or communities served by the program. It is also important to keep track of all program-related services and items distributed to, or received from, these people or entities. Let’s take a look at what each of these entails.

      Tracking materials sent and received
      If you send out informational, educational, or other materials, or items like press releases, you will want to have a record of the number sent. If you collect materials from other organizations, you will want to keep track of this, as well.

      Click here to view a sample form for tracking materials distributed and received.

      Tracking people contacted: Directly and Indirectly
      Counting direct contacts is straightforward. One method of keeping track of direct contacts is to use simple encounter forms which can be designed to collect basic information 1) about each person, workplace, etc. that has direct contact with the program and 2) about the nature of the contact. These encounter forms must be designed while the program is being developed and ready for use as soon as the program begins. Click here to view a sample encounter form.

      Not all contact with a program is direct. For example, many school-based tobacco prevention programs provide information to schoolchildren (direct) who, in turn, take the information home to parents (indirect). Other programs train members of the target population as counselors (direct) to work with their peers in the school community (indirect). Often, a program’s stated purpose is to reach community members through indirect methods. Often, too, programs have an indirect effect that was not planned.

      To estimate the number of people the program reaches indirectly, you could ask the people with whom the program has direct contact to keep track of their contacts (the people to whom they give the program’s information or service). For this purpose, they could use a system similar to the program’s system of keeping track of its direct contacts. In many cases, however, asking people with whom the program has direct contact to keep track of their contacts is impractical, unreliable, or both. When this is the case, you can devise a reliable method for estimating the number of indirect contacts. For example, you could estimate that half the third graders who attended a tobacco prevention program would speak to their parents about the information given to them.

      Click here to view a sample form for tracking people contacted.

  3. How does the program that is delivered differ from the program as planned?
    Once you have described what the program was intended to be (#1 above) and what the program actually is (#2 above), you can determine the ways in which these two things differ by comparing them. Sometimes, the actual program will be an improvement over the program that was planned. At other times, the deviations will be problematic, and need to be brought in line with the program as planned.

Tip: For more about tracking materials and contacts, take a look at Who Or What To Count During Process Evaluation, from Demonstrating Your Program’s Worth.

Top

Using Process Evaluation Results

The results of process evaluation have many uses. These include:

  • Quality control for delivery of the program
  • Demonstrating which program elements produce effective outcomes
  • Providing guidance for improving program elements or activities
  • Giving feedback about implementation to program managers
  • Demonstrating how well the target population has been reached
  • Providing information to stakeholders about the level and quality of program activity

In addition, much of the information gathered during process evaluation can be used for short- or long-term outcome evaluation, during which you will be calculating the effect your program has had on the target population.

Top

Scenarios

Here are a few scenarios in which Process Evaluation would be appropriate:

  • You are training program volunteers to speak to minority youth about tobacco use.
  • Your program is mailing out materials to local workplaces for the purpose of recruiting them to participate in the smoke-free environment program.
  • Program volunteers are meeting with legislators to discuss smoke-free environment legislation.
  • You are meeting with past program participants to determine ways in which the program might be improved.
  • You are mailing a newsletter to workplaces that have participated in your program to bring them up to date on smoke-free legislative actions.

In each instance, you would be interested in the number of members of the target population who were reached, the number of materials or services delivered, the way in which the services or materials were delivered, and what members of the target population might have been missed.

Top

Getting Started

The most important steps for starting process evaluation are:

  1. Develop a clear description of the program and its activities.
     
    Unless you have a clear understanding of what the program was trying to do, you will not know whether or not it achieved its objectives. For a review of how to develop and use logic models, go to Defining Your Program Using Logic Models in the Setting the Stage section of The Power of Proof.
     
  2. Develop a clear description of the target population.
     
    Do you want your program to be evaluated on the basis of the number of members of the target population who are contacted or on the number of contacts with members of the target population? The distinction is important, especially when a member of the target population may receive independent value or additional benefit from each contact with the program.
     
      Number of members contacted
      For number of members contacted, count only once each member of the target population who had contact with your program, regardless of how many times that person/workplace/community has contact.
     
      Number of contacts with members
      For number of contacts with members, count once each time the program had contact with a person/workplace/community, regardless of how many times some of the members had contact. The number of contacts with members should be the same as, or higher than, the number of members contacted.
     
  3. Develop necessary forms for use in documenting delivery of program materials and services. For samples of different forms for documenting services and materials, click here.
     
  4. Start with the first delivery of program materials/services to a member of the target population.

Top

Tips for Best Results

The following list includes important things to keep in mind as you begin process evaluation.

  • Be sure stakeholders understand that you are NOT evaluating the short- or long-term outcomes, or the effect of the program.
     
  • Stress that you are evaluating “what is happening,” and not how well any one staff member or participant is performing.
     
  • Let the stakeholders know that the feedback they provide may or may not result in changes in the program.
     
  • Monitor the collection and entry of process data. Data should be reviewed on a regular basis to ensure the quality of program delivery.
     
  • Make sure that the results get to those who need to know them and are in a position to make use of the information.

Top

--------------- 
1. Source: Bliss, M.J. & Emshoff, J.G. Workbook for designing a process evaluation. Produced for the Georgia Department of Human Resources, Division of Public Health.

 
Search TTAC