|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
"No student knows his subject: the most he knows is where
and how to find out the things he does not know."
— Woodrow Wilson |
Questionnaires
|
This section includes these parts. Click on each for more.
|
|
|
Fundamentals
A questionnaire is a data collection instrument that is used for of
collecting systematic, standardized information that can be expressed
numerically or in short answers. Questionnaires can provide information
on respondent behaviors, values, perceptions, desires, needs, preferences,
priorities, opinions, and experiences.
Questionnaires offer the following benefits:1
They simplify the gathering of information from
large numbers of people.
Responses can be readily analyzed to determine
underlying patterns and relationships, including trends over time.
They can target specific respondent groups and/or
specific issues or objectives of interest to the program staff and
participants.
They can gather information about people's
perceptions, desires, and opinions unavailable from other sources.
Their standard format provides consistency
across respondents.
The use of response choices (e.g., agree,
disagree) can make data processing easy.
Questionnaires can be administered face-to-face, by telephone,
through the mail, by e-mail, or on the web. The first
two methods require an interviewer, and the last three
are completed by the respondent. Questionnaires can
be used in experimental and quasi-experimental designs,
or in surveys that are conducted at one or many points
in time. When used in a survey, a questionnaire may
be referred to as the survey instrument.
Top
|
| When
to Use
Questionnaires are especially helpful when you know
the questions you need to ask, and want information
from a wide range of people. They are also valuable
for use in measuring results in experimental and quasi-experimental
designs, because of their standard and timely administration.
For this reason, they are often used in short- and long-term
outcome evaluation, but they can also be used during
formative and process evaluation. For more about evaluation
types, see the Evaluation
Planning or Types
of Evaluation sections of Power of Proof.
Telephone-administered and respondent-completed questionnaires
are used when you want to gather data from a large number
of people and it is not practical to meet them all face
to face. Telephone, e-mail, and web-based instruments
are especially useful when results are needed quickly.
While a program is under development, questionnaires
are a valuable tool when you want to:
-
Identify the aspects of the program that potential
users like and dislike before those aspects
are put into effect.
Use of a questionnaire is possible because you
know what the aspects of a program are and can ask
about each. Such information allows you to modify
the aspects that are unlikely to be successful.
For example, you might ask youth to rate on a scale
of 1 to 5 how well they understood the section on
risks associated with smoking in the brochures distributed
as a part of the Minority Youth Tobacco Prevention
program. If many youth respond that they did not
understand the risks, then it will be important
to clarify the material covered in the brochures
before distributing them on a large scale.
-
Gather baseline data on the knowledge, attitudes,
and beliefs of the target population.
For example, suppose your program's goal is to
increase the number of legislators who support smoke-free
environment legislation. You can administer a questionnaire
to legislators in the target population, before
the program begins, to see:
- how much they know about the risks associated
with secondhand smoke,
- what their attitudes are toward smoke-free environments,
and
- what they believe about whether or not people
support such legislation.
- Gather baseline data on the rates at which members
of the target population engage in behaviors of interest
to the program.
For example, if your program goal is to increase
the number of smoke-free workplaces, you can find
out the number of workplaces that are already smoke-free.
Having such information allows you to set a realistic
goal for how much you want to increase that number.
After the program is in effect, you can use questionnaires
to:
-
Measure the level of participants' satisfaction
with the program.
You can determine whether people in the target
population are receiving information about the program,
what the most common sources for the information
are, and whether the information they are receiving
is correct. With such knowledge, you can eliminate
the expenses (e.g., cost of newspaper advertisements)
associated with aspects of the program that are
not working.
-
Determine why the program is having unexpected
problems with no clear solution.
Questionnaires administered through surveys can
often locate the source of the problem, which may
then lead to the solution. For example, they can
show you how people who do not participate in your
program differ from those who do. Perhaps you will
find that the people who do not participate have
an ongoing schedule conflict at the time of the
program and are, therefore, unable to attend. Whatever
the reason, once you know what it is, you can modify
the program to fix the problem you discover.
-
Measure the immediate, or short-term effect, your
program is having on the target population's knowledge,
attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors (i.e., how much
they have changed since the program began).
For example, if your minority youth tobacco prevention
program is effective:
- The target population's knowledge of and belief
in the hazards or smoking will have increased,
and
- Their attitudes toward smoking will be less
favorable.
- Show the increase in the number of people who report
they are engaging in the behavior you are interested
in (e.g., how many more CEOs report that their workplace
is smoke-free than did so before the program, or how
many more minority young adults report that they do
not smoke) during short- or long-term outcome evaluation.
Top
|
|
Questionnaire Validity and Reliability
The following are a few tips for establishing the validity and reliability of
questionnaires.
Here are some general facts about the reliability and validity of questionnaires:
- The fact that each person is answering identical
questions on a questionnaire increases the reliability
of responses.2
- When information is sensitive or private, anonymous
questionnaires may reduce the likelihood of biased
reporting and, thus, raise the validity of the information.3
- At first glance, it seems like it would be easy.
But producing useful information through questionnaires
is a complex and difficult task. Questionnaires that
contain ill chosen questions and poor response options
produce information that is likely to be invalid and
not reliable, not to mention misleading and potentially
damaging.2
In the Sample Questions section, we provide a list of samples questions, some
examples of good questions that increase validity and reliability and some poorly written
questions that would decrease questionnaire validity and reliability. To review that
section now, click here.
Top
|
|
The Questionnaire Instrument
As we have discussed, the questionnaire is the most common data collection instrument
used to gather the data in surveys as well as experimental and quasi-experimental designs.
Other instruments include checklists, interview schedules, interview and focus group guides,
and logs or records of phone calls or other program contacts.
Before designing the questionnaire, you must decide on the method you will use to
administer it, because the method will dictate things like the questionnaire's length,
complexity, and level of language. For example, questionnaires that will be completed by
the respondent without an interviewer (i.e., self-administered) must be shorter and easier
to follow than those to be administered by a trained interviewer.
This table shows the advantages and disadvantages of the three methods for administering
questionnaires: face-to-face interview, telephone interview, or distribution (e.g., through
the mail) to people who complete and return the questionnaire to the program.
| Method |
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
| Face-to face Interviews |
Least selection bias: can interview people without telephones-even homeless people.
-
Greatest response rate: people are most likely to agree to be surveyed when asked
face-to-face.
Visual materials may be used.
|
Most costly: requires trained interviewers and travel time and costs.
Least anonymity: therefore, most likely that respondents will shade their responses
toward what they believe is socially acceptable.
|
| Telephone interviews |
Most rapid method.
Most potential to control the quality of the interview: interviewers remain in one
place, so supervisors can oversee their work.
Easy to select telephone numbers at random.
Less expensive than personal interviews.
Better response rate than for mailed surveys.
|
Most selection bias: omits homeless people and people without telephones.
Call-blocking and use of cell phones can also bias the responding sample.
Less anonymity for respondents than for those completing instruments without an interviewer.
As with face-to-face interviews, requires a trained interviewer.
|
| Instruments to be completed by respondent |
Most anonymity: therefore, least bias toward socially acceptable responses.
Cost per respondent varies with response rate: the higher the response rate, the lower the cost per respondent.
When mailed or handed out, respondent-completed questionnaires have less selection bias than telephone interviews.
-
E-mailed and web-based questionnaires
take little time, and no scheduling.
|
Least control over quality of data.
Dependent on respondent's reading level.
-
E-mailed and web-based questionnaires
have selection bias since not all people have
computer or web access.
Mailed instruments have lowest response rate.
Evaluations using mailed instruments take the most time to complete because such instruments require time in the mail and time for respondent to complete.
|
The best method to use depends on the purpose of the evaluation and the target population.
Let's say, for example, you want to evaluate a training program to assist sales staff in
refusing to sell cigarettes to minors. If program participants have a moderate level of
education, having them complete and return a questionnaire before they leave the classroom
is clearly the least expensive and most efficient method of data gathering. On the other
hand, if class participants have problems reading, a questionnaire to be completed in class
would not be useful, and you may need to conduct face-to-face interviews. Another example
might be if you were evaluating a smoking cessation program in a well-defined, low-income
housing area. In this case, you may need to interview. If so, face-to-face would be better
than telephone interviews, since income is an issue and some people with low income do not
have telephones.
Questionnaire Cover Letter
When mailing or e-mailing the questionnaire to respondents, make sure
to include a cover letter, personalized with the resident's name rather than using a generic
"Dear Resident." The cover letter should spell out the purpose and objectives of the survey,
who is being asked to respond to the survey and why, and how the resident was selected to
receive the questionnaire. It should also give a deadline for completing the instrument.
A two-week deadline is suggested. If an incentive will be provided to those who complete
the questionnaire, information on how to obtain the incentive should be provided.
The letter should be signed by an official, such as
the project manager or some other person, to show that
the study has been given a high priority. The letter
must include a contact person and telephone number in
case the respondent has questions. In addition, the
letter should include a pre-addressed, stamped envelope
for returning the questionnaire.4
To view a sample cover letter, click here.
Designing Your Questionnaire
The process of designing your questionnaire requires organization
and thoughtful consideration of how best to word the
questions so they will elicit the most useful responses.
Click on the link below for a list of steps to help
you design your questionnaire.
Questionnaire Design Process
Questionnaire Creation Services
Here is a list of just a few of the services that will assist you in creating your
survey instrument or questionnaire. Many will also help you administer them and analyze
the results. (NOTE: TTAC does not endorse any of these products)
Top
|
|
Format and Logistics
Administering questionnaires requires a good bit of
organization. Before you get started, do the following:5
- Decide how important the statistical validity and
reliability of your data are. The more important they
are, the more you will need to consult an expert to
help determine your sample group, method of data collection,
and how you will compute your results.
- It is best to use existing questionnaires, if they
are available. They save development time, and are
especially valuable if they have been tested to ensure
they work.
- If you must design your own questionnaire, make
sure you pilot test it.
For a review of pilot testing, go to Ensuring the Effectiveness of Instruments and Procedures. Click here to view that material now.
Administering Your Questionnaire
Here are some easy-to-follow steps for getting you started with questionnaire
administration for face-to-face interviews, telephone interviews, and respondent-completed
questionnaires.
- Face-to-face Interviews
- Develop your questionnaire
- Pilot test the questionnaire
- Assess validity and reliability
- Train your interviewers
- Determine your method of selecting those to be interviewed(e.g., go to every 3rd house starting with X; approach every 5th person entering the mall)
- Identify a private interviewing location
- Conduct the interviews
- Check for consistency across interviewers
For more about face-to-face surveys, visit
this site.
- Telephone Interview
- Develop your questionnaire
- Pilot test the questionnaire
- Assess validity and reliability
- Determine your method of selecting those to be interviewed
(e.g., random-digit dialing; interview oldest female in household)
- Conduct the interviews
- Check for consistency across interviewers
- Respondent-Completed
- Develop your questionnaire
- Pilot test the questionnaire
- Assess validity and reliability
- If mailed or e-mailed, identify a sampling frame (i.e., a listing
of members of the target population that has their addresses or e-mail
addresses)
- Select those to receive the questionnaire (e.g., every 5th person
on list)
- Prepare the cover letter and include a deadline
- Send (or distribute) the questionnaire
- Log in responses and note the date received
- Follow-up with non-respondents (if they can be identified, send
targeted reminders, if not, send general reminders)
- Compare respondents and non-respondents on any information you
have available (e.g., zip code of residence, gender)
|
|
Dealing with non-response
Non-response is a serious problem when it occurs. This is because people
who actually complete the questionnaire and return it might not be representative
of the entire target population. They may have a higher reading level, a
greater interest in the subject of the questionnaire, more free time, or
differ in any of a number of ways from those who do not respond. When
non-response occurs, you should first try to increase the response rate.
If you still have non-response, you should try to determine how the respondents
and non-respondents are different, so you will know how your results are
biased. Here are some specific things to do (in order):
- Try again to get the people to respond. You can do this by resending
the questionnaire, or phoning to encourage them to send the questionnaire
back. After two repeat attempts you probably will not increase response
any further.
- Follow-up with non-respondents and ask them if they would please
answer a few of the questions. Then, ask the questions you have selected
as being the most important on the questionnaire. Compare the responses of
these "non-respondents" to the responses of the people who completed and
returned their questionnaire.
- If you cannot follow-up with non-respondents because the questionnaire
is anonymous, compare the respondents to the total target population with
respect to any characteristics you have available (e.g., gender, zip code, etc.)
Top
|
|
Sample Questions
The most difficult part of creating a questionnaire is crafting the questions
so that you elicit the best information possible for the results you seek. For
best results, here are a few pointers for writing questionnaire items:
| Keep
it short and simple |
| POOR ITEM: What is the vocation of the parent
earning the major part of the family income? |
| GOOD ITEM: What type of work
does the head of your household do? |
| Avoid
vagueness |
| POOR ITEM: Was the self-help material provided
to you adequate? |
| GOOD ITEM: Did the brochure
on Quitting Smoking provide the information you
were seeking? |
| Avoid
abbreviations |
| POOR ITEM: Did the CIA information we provided
influence your decision? |
| GOOD ITEM: Did the information
on Clean Indoor Air influence your decision to adopt
a smoke-free workplace policy? |
| Avoid
negatives and double negatives |
| POOR ITEM: How sure are you that you won't stop
smoking? |
| GOOD ITEM: How sure are you
that you will continue smoking? |
| Avoid
bias in the question and in the answers |
| POOR ITEM: Your child's school is one of the first
schools in Georgia to adopt the Smoke-free Environment
Policy as recommended by the State Department of
Education. Do you support that policy? |
| GOOD ITEM: Do you support the
Smoke-free Environment Policy adopted by your child's
school? |
| Avoid
objectionable items |
| POOR ITEM: Why did you fail to inform your parents
that you started smoking? |
| GOOD ITEM: What are some reasons
you did not tell your parents you started smoking? |
| Have
only one concept per question or response |
| POOR ITEM: How many times per week do you smoke
or chew tobacco? |
| GOOD ITEM: How many times per
week do you chew tobacco? |
| ANSWERS: Smoke or chew tobacco; Drink beer, wine,
or spirits |
| POOR ITEM: Which of the following
do you do at least weekly? |
| GOOD ITEM: Which of the following do you do at
least weekly? |
| ANSWERS: Smoke; Chew tobacco;
Drink beer; Drink wine |
| Make
sure the answer categories match the question |
| POOR ITEM: How much did the visit by program personnel
influence you to vote for the smoke-free legislation? |
| ANSWERS: Never, Seldom, Sometimes,
Usually, Always |
| GOOD ITEM: The visit by program personnel influenced
me to vote for the smoke-free legislation. |
| ANSWERS: Strongly Disagree,
Disagree, Undecided, Agree, Strongly Agree |
| Response
categories should not overlap (i.e., should be mutually
exclusive) |
| POOR ITEM: How many times were you visited by
program personnel? |
| ANSWERS: None, 1-5, 5-10, 10-15,
15 or more |
| GOOD ITEM: How many times were you visited by
program personnel? |
| ANSWERS: None, 1-5, 6-10, 11-15,
16 or more |
| Response
categories should include all choices (i.e., should
be exhaustive) |
| POOR ITEM: How many times were you visited by
program personnel? |
| ANSWERS: Less than 5, 6-10,
11-15 (NOTE THAT there are no choices for those
who were visited exactly 5 times, or more than 15
times.) |
| GOOD ITEM: How many times were you visited by
program personnel? |
| ANSWERS: Less than 5, 5-10,
11-15, More than 15 |
For a sample of the 2005 California Adult Tobacco Survey (CATS) Instrument, created by California's Department of Health Services, click
here.
Tip: Click for more information
on developing questionnaires.
|
Top
|
|
--------------------
1. Source:
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development. (1978). Task 6: Data collection. In Program
evaluation and analysis: A technical guide for state
and local governments. Washington, DC: Prepared
for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
by Public Technology, Inc. (pp. 20-25).
2. Source:
Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention. (1989). Special topics in program
evaluation. In Evaluating juvenile justice programs:
A design monograph for state planners. Washington,
DC: Prepared for the U.S. Department of Justice, Office
of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention by Community
Research Associates, Inc. (pp. 40-41).
3. Source:
National Institute of Justice.
(1989). Obtaining information for evaluations. In Evaluating
drug control and system improvement projects: Guidelines
for projects supported by the Bureau of Justice Assistance.
Washington, DC: Prepared for the U.S. Department of
Justice, National Institute of Justice by Abt Associates,
Inc. (pp. 5-7).
4. Source:
U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and
Research. (1997). How do you get the information you
need for your evaluation? In A guide to evaluating
crime control of programs in public housing. Washington,
DC: Prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development by KRA Corporation (pp. 6.1-6.15).
5.
Source: Prime
II Project. (n.d.). Data gathering methods. In Performance
improvement toolkit. Retrieved April 12, 2004 from
the Prime II web site.
|
|
 |
|
|
|