OTHER FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE COLLEGE TOBACCO USE

Campuses are communities within themselves, but they are influenced by an array of factors beyond their boundaries. Outside influences can have an impact on campus tobacco use, campus tobacco policy options, and the effectiveness of campus tobacco prevention strategies. It is thus important to consider outside factors when determining what action steps to take in addressing campus tobacco use.

State and Local Tobacco Policies
State and local tobacco policies can have a direct impact on campus tobacco use, policy, and prevention activities. For example, Connecticut College in New London, CT, declared all dormitories smoke-free as of August 2003 in anticipation of a new state law prohibiting smoking in the workplace.

In some parts of the country, increasingly restrictive state and local tobacco policies, such as smoke-free restaurants and bars, discourage tobacco use in off-campus social venues. Alternatively, off-campus restaurants and bars that allow smoking create challenges for campuses trying to discourage tobacco use by providing social venues that normalize tobacco use.

The process of investigating state and local policies may help you identify tobacco prevention allies and potential funding sources at the community level.

For current information about state and local tobacco laws, see our list of State and Regional Initiatives in the Resources and Links section of this site or follow these links:

CDC’s State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation System (STATE)

National List of Smoke-Free Ordinances
Americans for Nonsmokers Rights Foundation


CDC’s State Tobacco Control Highlights 1999
Compendium of state tobacco laws

Return to top

College Investment in Tobacco Stocks
Colleges invest endowment and foundation funds in a variety of holdings, including tobacco stocks. Some colleges have decided that investing school monies into the tobacco industry violates ethical principles and have divested, selling some or all of their tobacco industry stock. For example, the University of Michigan divested from all tobacco stock in 2000. By taking this type of action, universities can symbolically demonstrate their commitment to tobacco-free communities, contributing to a tobacco-free normative environment.

“Big Tobacco Sucks,” the campaign against transnational tobacco, has written an excellent guide to divestment for colleges. The guide entitled “Death is a Bad Investment—The Tobacco Industry, Corporate Power, & Your School’s Money: A Divestment Action Guide” can be downloaded at:
http://www.bigtobaccosucks.org/home/pdf/Divestment_Action_Guide.pdf

Return to top

Tobacco Marketing to Youth Aged 18-24
When the Master Settlement Agreement prohibited the tobacco industry from marketing tobacco products to children under age 18, youth aged 18-24 became the primary marketing target for the tobacco industry. Tobacco companies market to youth through advertising, the alternative press, bar promotions, and events at fraternities and sororities. For example, off-campus bars in localities without smoke-free bar and restaurant ordinances may distribute free cigarettes to students as part of tobacco industry “sampling” promotions. See our “Marketing to 18-24 Year-olds” fact sheet to learn more about the impact of tobacco industry marketing on college students.

For more information on tobacco marketing to youth, see the following resources:

Cummings K, Morley C, Horan J, Steger C, and Leavell N-R. “Marketing to America’s Youth: Evidence from Corporate Documents” Tobacco Control. 11(2002):i15-i17. Full text available online at:
http://tc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/11/suppl_1/i5

Ling P, and Glantz S. “Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults.”
Powerpoint Presentation available online at:
http://tc.bmjjournals.com/misc/powerpoint.shtml

Return to top

 

 
Search TTAC