TAKING ACTION ON YOUR CAMPUS

As you begin to consider tobacco prevention program and policy ideas for your campus you will need to think strategically to ensure that the actions you take will achieve your goals. This section outlines a five-step process to guide you from the beginning stages of identifying problems to evaluating results.

Every campus is unique and the exact process of change will vary from school to school.

Some movement back and forth between steps will be necessary. What follows is a basic roadmap designed to help you maximize your efforts, conserve resources, and achieve your desired results in a timely manner.

Key steps:

  1. Conduct a Problem Analysis
  2. Set Goals and Objectives
  3. Select Strategies
  4. Implement Change
  5. Evaluate Efforts

Other issues to consider during the strategic planning process include:

Five key steps to taking action:

1. Conduct a Problem Analysis
Conducting a problem analysis is the first critical step in addressing tobacco use on your campus. The goal of problem analysis—also called needs assessment, environmental scanning, or formative research—is to learn as much as possible about tobacco use, perceptions, and programs and policies on your campus in order to develop effective prevention strategies that match the needs of your school.

Taking a comprehensive look at tobacco use and prevention on your campus will help you to identify needs, wants, allies, resources, and barriers. This is also the time to look beyond your campus to learn the basic College Tobacco Facts, review recommended campus tobacco prevention policies and models (see Comprehensive Prevention Model), and find out what other campuses are doing with respect to tobacco prevention (see Campus Examples).

Some key problem analysis tasks include estimating the percentage of students who use tobacco, gauging student perceptions about how many of their peers smoke, identifying all current campus tobacco prevention policies, programs, and resources, familiarizing yourself with state and local tobacco laws, and connecting with campus groups and individuals with an interest in tobacco issues.

Some common problem analysis tasks include: reviewing existing records such as campus tobacco policies; accessing data from student surveys conducted by health services or other school offices to estimate campus smoking rates; and researching current and proposed state and local tobacco laws, such as smoke-free workplace legislation, that could apply to your campus. Other approaches involve conducting interviews or focus groups with key campus personnel or student groups to determine campus climate with respect to tobacco issues.

A key strength of conducting a problem analysis is to ensure that the steps you take meet the actual needs of your campus. Without conducting a needs assessment, your efforts may be misguided, leading to wasted time and energy. For example, your campus may prohibit smoking in residence halls, yet you know that smoking is still a problem in some dorms. Your initial reaction may be to strengthen sanctions for violations, yet problem analysis reveals that the current sanctions are clear and appropriate. Further research indicates that the many small dorms on campus are in full compliance with the smoking ban and that the smoking problem is confined to the large multiplex dorm. In discussions with resident assistants you learn that the personalized approach to enforcement that works well in the smaller dorms does not work in the large dorm setting. Instead of increasing sanctions for violations, your efforts would be best focused on finding a more workable approach to enforcement in the large dorm setting.

Each campus is different and problem analysis approaches will vary. In some cases it may be possible to conduct a very extensive and systematic data collection process that taps a wide range of sources. Under these circumstances you may be one of a group of people that shares the problem analysis research tasks. Your work may culminate in a written report to be reviewed by all key stakeholders.

Alternately, your situation may call for a more informal approach that you carry out single-handedly. One or two people can gather a great deal of useful information in a limited period of time. Either way, be sure to tap as many sources as possible.

In summary, problem analysis is an essential first step toward taking tobacco prevention action on your campus. It can help you identify priority issues, plan more effectively, and decide where you need to concentrate your efforts. A careful problem analysis will give you the facts and understanding you need to make your case for tobacco prevention initiatives on your campus. It can help you find allies, anticipate potential barriers, build alliances, and utilize existing resources. It provides a strong foundation from which to select goals, objectives, and strategies.

Some key questions to consider in the problem analysis stage:

  • What are the tobacco use rates and trends on your campus? How do they compare with those on other campuses?
  • What are student attitudes and perceptions related to tobacco use? Do students have an exaggerated perception of the number of students who smoke?
  • What are the current campus tobacco policies and enforcement strategies? Are current policies enforced? By whom?
  • What tobacco prevention programs and services are available on campus? Are they publicized? Are they being utilized?
  • How do your school’s tobacco prevention programs and services compare with other schools in your area? Nationally?
  • Who is interested in tobacco prevention/policy-making on campus?
  • What resources are available to address campus tobacco issues?
  • What state or local laws exist related to smoking? Is your campus in compliance?

Key resources to consider in conducting problem analysis research on campus:

  • Existing campus records such as written policies, results of student surveys, health services department records.
  • Key informants, such as personnel from Health Services, Facilities, Residence Life, Risk Manager/Legal Affairs, Admissions, Campus Law Enforcement, and student government. Try to gather input from all key stakeholders.
  • Focus groups with students or faculty/staff/administrators.
  • State and local laws.
  • A survey you conduct on campus. A simple online survey is a cheap, fast, and efficient way to gather input from members of the campus community, especially students.

Problem analysis links and resources:

American College Health Association. “National College Health Assessment.”

California Youth Advocacy Network. "CYAN College Assessment: Campus Survey."

California Youth Advocacy Network. "Faculty/Staff Behaviors, Attitudes, and Perceptions Regarding Tobacco on Campus."

California Youth Advocacy Network. "Students' Behaviors, Attitudes, and Perceptions Regarding Tobacco on Campus."

College Alcohol Risk Assessment Guide

Community Tool Box. “Analyze Problems and Goals”

Education Devlopment Center. “Survey of Tobacco Control at Vermont Institutions of Higher Education.”

Oetting E, Donnermeyer J, Plested B, Edwards R, Kelly K, and Beauvais F.
“Assessing Community Readiness for Prevention.”
The International Journal of the Addictions. 30:6 (1995);659-683.

Return to Key Steps

2. Set Goals and Objectives
Once you have conducted a thorough problem analysis, the next step is to set your campus tobacco prevention goals and objectives. There are often many possible choices. For this reason it is advisable to get input from others on campus, either informally or as part of a working group, as you complete the goal- and objective-setting process.

Start by setting broad goals that will match the needs, wants, priorities, and resources of your campus. Goals are broad statements about expected results that provide clear program direction. “Becoming a smoke-free student body” is an example of a broad goal. Other broad goals might involve making all dormitories smoke-free, decreasing exposure to secondhand smoke, or increasing the number of students who successfully quit smoking. The knowledge you gained during the problem analysis stage plus continuing input from others who share your interest in campus tobacco prevention will help assure that the goals you set are realistic and appropriate for your campus at this time.

Next, set your objectives. Objectives are the specific, measurable interim steps toward achieving your broad goals. Each objective is linked with one particular goal. For example “decrease the percentage of students who smoke cigarettes by 10% during the next 18 months” is a specific and measurable objective toward the broad goal of “becoming a smoke-free student body.” Often there will be more than one objective associated with each broad goal.

When possible, objectives should be specified in numerical terms that describe anticipated increases or decreases in certain actions or behaviors. For example, “the social norms campaign will decrease misperceptions about inflated student smoking rates by 25% …”

Objectives must be established before the new program or policy is put into place and, when possible, should apply to a specified time period. Make sure that the time frame you select is linked to the frequency of data collection. For example, it would be difficult or impossible to measure the effectiveness of an objective to decrease misperceptions about inflated student smoking rates by 25% within the next six months if social norms data is collected only at 12-month intervals.

The objectives you set at this stage will become the outcome measures used to determine the success of your efforts during the evaluation phase. Now is the time to begin formulating your evaluation plan by thinking through exactly how you will measure each objective. You may wish to involve an experienced faculty member or other expert to guide you with this process.

In summary, use your problem analysis research, in consultation with others on campus, to set your goals and objectives. Consider what other similar campuses have achieved to ensure that your goals and objectives are realistic. Be sure that your objectives are as specific and measurable and possible. The goals and objectives you specify will drive the next key steps of formulating and selecting effective strategies, implementation and evaluation. Choose them carefully.

Some key points:

  • Goals should be broad, yet realistic and appropriate for your campus at this time.
  • Each goal should be linked to one or more objectives.
  • Objectives should give a clear indication of what changes are planned.
  • Objectives should be measurable and specified in numerical terms when possible.
  • Before you set an objective, think about how you will measure it. Be realistic. If, for example, you do not have the means to measure a percentage change in your outcome of interest, it is better to set a less specific objective that you can estimate in some way.
  • Objectives should apply to a specified period of time.
  • Your objectives will become the outcome measures you use to measure success or failure during evaluation phase.
  • Make a list of all possible obstacles that may interfere with achieving your goals and objectives.
  • Consult with key campus stakeholders as you make decisions about goals and objectives.

Goals and objectives links and resources:

American Cancer Society’s Smoke-Free New England Campus Initiative.
Advocating for a Smoke-Free Campus: A Manual for College and University Students.
Chapter 2: “Timeline.” 2001.

HealthyPeople 2010 Toolkit. “Setting Health Priorities and Establishing Objectives”

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
"Planned Approach to Community Health Guide."

Return to Key Steps

3. Select Strategies
The third key step to addressing tobacco use on your campus is to select strategies for accomplishing your goals and objectives and develop a detailed plan of action. Consult the research literature to identify promising science-based prevention strategies that will meet your needs.

Review the case studies and case study briefs in our Campus Examples section for strategy ideas that have been put into action on campuses around the country. For example, mounting a social norms marketing campaign is a popular strategy for achieving goals and objectives related to decreasing the percentage of students with inflated perceptions about campus smoking rates.

Check in with key stakeholders to select strategies that will work on your campus. Brainstorm about possible unintended consequences and ways to avoid them.

Develop an action plan that lists all of the tasks that must be completed to put the strategies you choose into place. For example, some of the tasks commonly associated with a social norms marketing campaign include administering a survey, developing and testing campaign messages, designing and printing ads and posters, distributing posters, and conducting research to evaluate the impact of the campaign.

For each task, think through who will be responsible for doing the work. Establish a timeline that determines when the work will start and stop, and when necessary, how you will pay for it. Make a checklist that includes each of these components.

Before you finalize your action plan think in practical terms about how you will evaluate the success of the strategies you have chosen. This will help ensure that you have the time and resources you need to carry out an effective evaluation.

In summary, your action plan lays out the strategies and specific related tasks you will implement to reach your goals and objectives. Use a checklist to document key tasks indicating what will happen, who will do it, when it will happen, and needed resources. You may also want to develop a calendar of key dates to distribute and perhaps post outside your office to keep everyone involved in implementing the plan on track. Your action plan should be tailored to the needs, wants, and climate of your campus. Solicit input about the plan from key stakeholders before it is finalized, approved and put into action. Take the time now to think about how you will evaluate the impact of the actions you are planning.

Some key questions to consider when selecting strategies and developing an action plan:

  • Will the proposed changes help you reach your stated goals and objectives?
  • What actual tasks will need to be taken to implement the proposed changes?
  • What level of support (e.g., financial, personnel) will be necessary to carry out these changes? See the case studies in the Campus Examples section of this website for examples of successful projects completed with limited funds.
  • Is official approval of the plan necessary before the plan can be put into action? Who has the authority to approve policy or program changes? Who else should be consulted about the proposed changes?
  • What groups will need to be involved in the change process (e.g., Residential Life, Buildings and Grounds, Health Services)? What will they be asked to do?
  • What are the possible unintended consequences of these changes and how can you address them?

Selecting strategies links and resources:

American Cancer Society’s Smoke-Free New England Campus Initiative.
Advocating for a Smoke-Free Campus: A Manual for College and University Students.
Chapter 2, “Action Plan.” 2001.

Community Toolbox. “Choosing and Adapting Community Interventions.”

Return to Key Steps

4. Implement Change
The next key step is implementation, the process of putting a new policy or program into effect. With a well thought-out plan, the implementation phase should consist of completing the tasks and actions you have outlined.

Assemble a committee of key players to ensure that the plan is executed as planned, to monitor progress, to discuss next steps, and to address any unforeseen problems. This committee does not have to be large, but should meet regularly to drive implementation of your plan.

Be sure that ample training and support is available for staff to carry out assigned tasks and to handle issues as they arise. For example, if Resident Assistants are in charge of front line enforcement for a new smoke-free dorm policy, be sure that they have been fully trained in how to handle violations, and know who to contact if problems arise.

Good communication is essential during implementation. The success of new policies and programs often depends on how well you publicize them. For example, recruitment for “Quit Challenges” and other student tobacco education and cessation programs involves getting the word out to students.

When new campus policies are put into place it is critical to notify all community members well before implementation. Advance notices should both announce the changes and inform campus community members of the need for, and benefits of, the new policy.

Consider the best ways to communicate to all constituents who will be affected. Some possible approaches include a campus advertising campaign, signage, leaflets, or direct communication from a campus authority such as a letter from the college president. Keeping key campus constituents informed as you progress will help you prevent problems from arising and pave the way for future actions.

In summary, good communication is essential to success during implementation phase. It is important to publicize new programs and policies and to monitor progress as you put them plan into action. Be prepared to respond quickly to unforeseen problems and challenges that can arise.

Some key questions to consider when implementing change:

  • Who should comprise a working group or committee to execute the plan?
  • How long a time period should there be from authorization of new policies to implementation?
  • What is the best way to communicate with the campus community about new policies and programs?
  • Who should the message about a major policy change come from? The President? The Director of Health Services? The President of the Student Government?
  • How will changes be advertised? Does signage need to be made?
  • Have the required structural alterations been made in advance of the change? For example, were ashtrays moved away from building entrances on schedule?
  • Has anything changed (e.g., resources, campus climate) since the plan was originally developed?

Implementing change links and resources:

American Cancer Society’s Smoke-Free New England Campus Initiative.
Advocating for a Smoke-Free Campus: A Manual for College and University Students.
Chapter 3, “Strategies for Action.” 2001.

University of New Hampshire: "Tobacco Policy Pamphlet"

Return to Key Steps

5. Evaluate Efforts
Evaluation is the process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting information to find out if your program or policy worked as intended. In addition, evaluation will enable you to identify problems and make needed changed to improve the effectiveness of your program or policy.

Evaluations provide data to support the continuation of a program or policy, increase funding for an initiative, or lend support for new policies and further action. For example, a finding that a new campus cessation program was so popular that students had to be put on waiting lists would support a request for additional cessation program funds.

Remember, it is critical to plan your evaluation well in advance of implementation. Determining ahead of time what data will be collected and gathering it as you go, rather than after the fact, is important. Some data that may have been easy to collect during implementation may be impossible to collect after the fact.

Conducting a thorough evaluation involves gathering information about both the implementation process and outcomes of interest. These two kinds of evaluation are called process evaluation and outcomes evaluation.

Process evaluation addresses questions about whether a program is carried out as planned. For example, was the effort to notify the campus community of a revamped campus tobacco cessation program through a letter to parents, emails to students, and notices in the school newspaper implemented as intended? Were there delays or other problems in the notification process? This can be assessed by examining mail, email and newspaper records. In addition, short interviews or surveys with students or parents can help assess whether the communication channels were effective in reaching them.

Another process measure might determine the extent to which the college health service was able to handle a spike in requests for the new cessation services. Were all interested students enrolled in services or was it necessary to put students on waiting lists? This can be accomplished by reviewing health service records, talking with health services personnel and perhaps students. Did students who were turned away sign up for the waiting list or not? Ideally, this type of information will be collected throughout the implementation phase and not afterwards. Doing so increases accuracy and gives you a chance to take corrective action as needed.

Outcomes evaluation addresses whether or not policy or program objectives were met. For example, did the revamped tobacco cessation program meet its objective of attracting 10% more students than the old program within the first six months of operation? This can be assessed by checking cessation program records to examine how many students enrolled in the program.

The actual steps you take during evaluation will depend on your resources. For example, if you are not able to carry out a campus-wide student survey, you may be able to conduct focus groups with students.

In considering your evaluation plan, keep in mind that events on campus, in the surrounding community, and on the state and national levels may influence student behaviors. These events may have an impact on the effectiveness of your program or policy. For example, did a new program to reduce the number of social smokers on campus coincide with a major tobacco company marketing effort that involved placing large ads in your newspaper and around campus and giving out free cigarettes at parties? If so, this outside influence needs to be taken into account when ascertaining the effectiveness of your program.

In summary, evaluation tells you if your program or policy was effective, can point to possible improvements, and can provide data to support continuation or even expansion of a successful initiative. Your evaluation plan should cover both process and outcomes. It is critical to plan your evaluation well in advance.

Some key questions to consider when evaluating efforts:

  • What was the impact of the implemented changes?
  • Were the programs/policies implemented as planned?
  • How did the program/policy affect different groups on campus?
  • Did unforeseen problems arise during implementation? If so, what were they?
  • Did we meet our objectives?
  • What other factors may have contributed to the effectiveness of the program or policy?
  • What additional steps are necessary to reach the stated goals?
  • What did we learn that can guide us in future efforts?

Evaluation links and resources:

Community Tool Box. “Developing an Evaluation Plan.”

User Friendly Handbook for Project Evaluation, National Science Foundation

Understanding Evaluation: The Way to Better Prevention Programs.
Muraskin, LD. U.S. Department of Education, (1993).
Contract Number LC89089001.

Return to Key Steps

Other issues to consider:

Coalition Building
Tobacco programs and policies have a better chance of success when supported by a multiple campus stakeholders. A campus coalition brings key stakeholders together to pool their energies and resources to work toward a common goal. Coalition members should represent as many perspectives as possible from diverse campus constituencies. Members have a shared vision, participate actively in making decisions about coalition activities, and help identify resources for these activities. Coalitions enhance communication among key individuals, maximize the use of available resources, and create a base of social and political support for a tobacco prevention agenda.

Some key stakeholder groups to consider: administration, health services, residential life, building and grounds, faculty, students, and parents.

Coalition-building links and resources:

American Cancer Society’s Smoke-Free New England Campus Initiative.
Advocating for a Smoke-Free Campus: A Manual for College and University Students.
Chapter 2, “Allies: Whom to Involve.” 2001.

Community Toolbox. “Coalition Building I: Starting a Coalition.”

Citizen Works. “Building a Coalition.”

Return to Other Issues

Presidential Leadership
Visible presidential leadership on tobacco policy or programming is crucial. Presidents have the power to make policy and programmatic changes to improve the health and safety of all members of the campus community. Presidents can demonstrate leadership by repeatedly addressing tobacco issues and solutions in writings and speeches and by conveying clear expectations and standards.

Presidential leadership links and resources:

American Cancer Society’s Smoke-Free New England Campus Initiative.
Advocating for a Smoke-Free Campus: A Manual for College and University Students.
Chapter 3: “Meeting with the Administration.” 2001.

DiBaggio, J. “Presidents’ Public Diaries: Day One—Smoking on Campus.”
Journal of College and Character.

Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention.
“Be Vocal, Be Visible, Be Visionary: Recommendations for College and University Presidents on Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention.” 1997.

Return to Other Issues

Enforcement Issues
To be effective, policy change must be accompanied by consistent and effective enforcement and clear sanctions. Start by working with those who will be in charge of enforcement such as campus police, judicial affairs, or resident assistants. Involve them in the planning process to help ensure that the enforcement strategies and sanctions you develop are appropriate and workable. Some key components to consider in developing an enforcement plan include: (1) assuring that new policies, enforcement strategies, and sanctions are clearly communicated well in advance of implementation; (2) making appropriate changes in the physical environment, such as posting signs that explain new restrictions or regulations; (3) identifying and educating those who will be responsible for carrying out enforcement, such as resident assistants; and (4) developing a plan for reporting violations and carrying out any related disciplinary action. Having a clear enforcement policy will help all members of the campus community understand their rights and responsibilities and will encourage compliance with new tobacco policies.

Enforcement resource:

Majchrzak NE, Rigotti N, Park E et al. “Tobacco Use by Massachusetts Public College Students”
Powerpoint Presentation, National Conference on Tobacco and Health 2002.
(See slides on enforcement)

Return to Other Issues

Student Involvement
Involving students in a program or policy initiative is crucial. As the target of most campus tobacco policies and programs, it is important to consider student beliefs, attitudes, behaviors, and opinions about tobacco use. Student support for an initiative makes compliance more likely and enforcement more manageable. In addition, students can be an important and affordable source of manpower in tobacco policy or program campaigns. Our Ohlone College case study brief about the Students Toward A Rapid Smoke Free School (STARRS) organization provides an excellent example of the effectiveness of student activism.

Student involvement link:

BACCHUS and GAMMA’s Tobacco Free U. “Student Involvement.”

Return to Other Issues

Faculty/Staff Support
Faculty and staff often have expertise in tobacco issues, in policy-making, or other areas that may be helpful in addressing tobacco prevention on campus. Identifying faculty and staff with personal interest in tobacco issues may lend support and add resources to an initiative. As discussed in our University of New Hampshire Case Study, that school’s comprehensive tobacco policy was fashioned largely by a faculty member with expertise in tobacco issues.

In addition to providing skills and expertise, it is important to keep in mind that faculty and staff are members of the campus community who spend far more time on a campus than students through years of full-time work. It is important to take their tobacco prevention needs and opinions into consideration. Our Bowdoin College Case Study documents how needs of the entire college community (faculty, administration, staff, and students) were considered in making changes to the school’s tobacco cessation program.

Faculty/staff support link:

Ryan, B and DeJong, W. “Making the Link: Faculty and Prevention.”
Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention. 2002.

Return to Other Issues

Media Coverage
Consider on-campus and off-campus media sources that can help disseminate information about campus tobacco issues and policies. Opinion columns in school newspapers, and public service announcements on campus cable television and radio stations are potential forums for promoting a tobacco policy or program. Local news coverage of a tobacco prevention campaign may help garner additional support from the community, as well as encourage colleges to take a firm stance on tobacco use. Our University of Washington Case Study provides an excellent example of the benefits of broadcast media coverage in promoting tobacco policy changes.

Media coverage links and resources:

American Cancer Society—Smoke-Free New England Campus Initiative’s sample press release

American Cancer Society—Smoke-Free New England Campus Initiative’s sample feature/op-ed articles

Coalition on Human Needs: "Media Tips"

Citizen Works: "Utilizing the Media"

American Public Health Association media advocacy manual

Return to Other Issues

State and Local Laws
State and local tobacco laws can provide support for tobacco initiatives on campus. These laws are becoming increasingly common throughout the country. Review them carefully to assure that campus policies are in compliance.

State and local laws links and resources:

CDC State Tobacco Tracking

American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation: "Smoke Free Ordinances"

Return to Other Issues

Final summary:
Successfully implementing new programs and policies to address campus tobacco use is challenging, but rewarding, work. A careful problem analysis and planning and evaluation process will help ensure that the goals, objective, and strategies you select best meet the needs and resources of your campus. Involving key campus constituents and considering campus, local, and state resources will help ensure the most effective programs possible. Good communication is essential throughout the entire process.

Remember that making change is rarely a neat or linear process and some back and forth movement between steps is necessary. Check our Mentoring Minutes section for tips from campus leaders with firsthand tobacco prevention policy and program experience.

Return to top

 
Search TTAC